“There is no abstract art. You must always start with something.
Afterward you can remove all reality.” — Pablo Picasso
Picasso also said “we all know that Art is not truth. Art is a lie that makes us realize truth”, while the American art philosopher, Arthur C. Danto described art as “embodied meaning” — apparently to distinguish Andy Warhol’s Brillo Boxes from actual Brillo boxes.
So is my image art? It contains a stripped-away (and colour-inverted) image of art — a cast-glass sculpture by Gregor Kregar (Creature exhibition, Sarjeant Gallery, Whanganui.)
Is it whimsy? A comment on homelessness? Or is it nothing more than a collection of pixels to which you each will respond in your own way? Please let me know.
Debbie at Travel with Intent started me on this train of thought with this week’s quote-inspired challenge. If you haven’t already, pop over to see her wonderfully abstract images.
It’s very creative! My first reaction was “wow, the colors!” I had to look at it a few seconds to get the deeper meaning (thanks for the hints!). I say yes, its art. It’s visually stunning AND made me think.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Tracy. Now all I have to do is turn the hints into a four-page artist statement with lots of words no-one really understands and I’m good to go 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
We say beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. It is similar with art. In your picture the colours are making a strong impression, so for me it is art. Perhaps we can express then art in the negative and state that art does not make an impression is NOT art. Best wishes! Peter
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think that is wise Peter. I read somewhere recently that the difference between art and design is that art moves you; and design doesn’t (unless it’s the design of a bus) 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t see it as a collection of pixels so I am going to go with art. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you!
LikeLike
Strikes me as certainly more art than a cow in formaldehyde.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Mara. Now all I need is a gallery, a rich patron or two and probably an image makeover. I think I’m a bit too suburban for the art establishment. Hehe. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
That glowing gnome inspiring the caption is a clever twist and made me smile. I think anything created with enjoyment is an art form
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is a lovely way of thinking about art Pauline 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting!
LikeLike
I love the colors, even though I’m not at all a fan of gnomes, especially those people display in their gardens. 🙂 It’s much more art to me than many of the “artistic” pieces I’ve seen displayed in the modern section of many museums.
janet
LikeLiked by 1 person
Totally with you on the garden gnomes!!!!
The one I photographed is beautiful, a sort of lemon-coloured cast glass. It was in a glass case in the exhibition — I think as a kind of joke about art and what is and isn’t regarded as “precious.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pleasing to the eye? Thought provoking? I say yes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you 🙂
LikeLike
I think that it’s something that everyone will interpret differently and some will see whimsy while others a statement.But to me that’s what makes art, art.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for that. I tend to agree that art is in the eyes and mind of the beholder. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definintely art!!! What else could it be? Love the luminous colours and the caption! Strangely enough though I´ve a slight terror of garden gnomes, don´t know why. Maybe I was once a fairy and they played some evil tricks with me. 😉 xxxxxx
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gnomes are quite sinister — even the “cutesy” garden ornament kind. I find those gardens that are full of gnomes and windmills and ceramic toadstools incredibly creepy. The stuff of nightmares. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
looks like nice art to me – and the musing about it was just fun.
also, your title reminded me of a blog I used to follow in 2014 – it had that title “But is it art?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Yvette. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS I keep forgetting to mention this – not sure if you have seen your ttitle in the header – but it is a little off – there is an extra parenthesis and the word number is twice – ??
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for that. Who knows how long it had been like that — I’d never noticed 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
wel I think so many of us visit via reader or when we are on the site we just skim the headers – at least i do.
But earlier this summer, I was checking sites via mobile and it stuck out – and sometimes there is art going on – but then I thought – nah – she would not have the number twice….
and guess i was right
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point! And thanks again 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think art is defined by the creator—if YOU see it as art, then it is. It is your comment, your perspective, your creation, which makes it art. Not all art is “good” art, whatever that means, but to me, when a person takes tools to depict something whether it is nature, man-made, or an abstraction, it is art.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is Art!Greeting to you sweet friend Su 🙂 ❤ xxx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you dear Doda xxxx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi this is a beautiful piece!
If you have a chance I would really appreciate it if you could check out my blog! rawdumplings.wordpress.com
it would mean a lot! Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
All that matters is if it’s art in the creator’s eyes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: But is it art? — Zimmerbitch – SEO
Well, I like it
LikeLiked by 1 person